Processes for Reviewing NIH Intramural Science
Scientific reviews of intramural research are the responsibility of the Scientific Directors (SDs) and are conducted at least once every four years by outside expert Boards of Scientific Counselors (BSC).
- Boards of Scientific Counselors (BSC)
- NIH Manual Chapter 3005: Review and Evaluation of Intramural Programs
- Policies and Procedures to Guide Boards of Scientific Counselors in Reviewing Intramural Research at NIH
- Ethics for Special Government Employees
- The NIH Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Certification for Individuals Evaluating All NIH Intramural Programs (BSC Reviews, Site Visits, etc.)
- The NIH Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Certification for Individuals Evaluating NIH Intramural Clinical Protocols
- Scientific Review of Clinical Protocols
- Blue Ribbon Panel Reviews of IC Intramural Research Programs
- Role and Review of Scientific Directors and Clinical Directors (or Equivalent)
- Report of the External Advisory Committee of the Director’s Advisory Committee & Implementation Plan and Progress Report (1999)
- NIH ACD Long-Term Intramural Research Program (LT-IRP) Planning Implementation Report (pending)
This page was last updated on Wednesday, July 24, 2024